<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 947 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365475</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed in part. The order related to the show cause notice dated 24.08.2015 was set aside as it was barred by time. The matter related to the show cause notice dated 27.10.2015 was remanded for fresh computation. The Tribunal clarified that if the computation shows that the duty paid by the appellant exceeds the Cenvat credit availed, the appellant should receive the consequential benefit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2018 13:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=531077" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 947 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365475</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed in part. The order related to the show cause notice dated 24.08.2015 was set aside as it was barred by time. The matter related to the show cause notice dated 27.10.2015 was remanded for fresh computation. The Tribunal clarified that if the computation shows that the duty paid by the appellant exceeds the Cenvat credit availed, the appellant should receive the consequential benefit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365475</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>