https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365473 CENVAT credit was treated as admissible on outward transportation services used for clearance of finished goods from the place of removal because, under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 as it then stood, services used in relation to such clearance fell within the scope of input service. The later amendment substituting "from the place of removal" with "upto the place of removal" was noted but did not govern the relevant period, so the demand was held unsustainable. en-us Mon, 23 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Aug 2018 09:24:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365473 CENVAT credit was treated as admissible on outward transportation services used for clearance of finished goods from the place of removal because, under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 as it then stood, services used in relation to such clearance fell within the scope of input service. The later amendment substituting "from the place of removal" with "upto the place of removal" was noted but did not govern the relevant period, so the demand was held unsustainable. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 23 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365473