https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365472 The Tribunal addressed whether the products were classifiable as Ayurvedic medicaments under Chapter 30 or as cosmetics under the Department's proposed headings. It relied on earlier connected decisions involving the same manufacturing arrangement, noting that the ingredients, licence position and supporting certificates showed the goods were understood and treated as Ayurvedic preparations. As no fresh facts or cogent basis were shown to depart from that view, the Department's challenge to reclassification failed and Chapter 30 treatment was upheld in favour of the assessee. en-us Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Aug 2018 09:24:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365472 The Tribunal addressed whether the products were classifiable as Ayurvedic medicaments under Chapter 30 or as cosmetics under the Department's proposed headings. It relied on earlier connected decisions involving the same manufacturing arrangement, noting that the ingredients, licence position and supporting certificates showed the goods were understood and treated as Ayurvedic preparations. As no fresh facts or cogent basis were shown to depart from that view, the Department's challenge to reclassification failed and Chapter 30 treatment was upheld in favour of the assessee. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365472