<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (4) TMI 61 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14107</link>
    <description>Reassessment under the Estate Duty Act was barred because section 73A(b) did not permit reassessment proceedings to be commenced after three years from the date of assessment to estate duty. The notice for reassessment and the reassessment order were both issued beyond that period, so the proceeding was time-barred. The consequential demand based on the invalid reassessment was therefore quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:40:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53107" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (4) TMI 61 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14107</link>
      <description>Reassessment under the Estate Duty Act was barred because section 73A(b) did not permit reassessment proceedings to be commenced after three years from the date of assessment to estate duty. The notice for reassessment and the reassessment order were both issued beyond that period, so the proceeding was time-barred. The consequential demand based on the invalid reassessment was therefore quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14107</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>