https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365465 The court directed the 2nd respondent to permit the petitioner to revise the returns for December 2016 to include the diesel generator purchase, emphasizing completion of the process within three weeks of initiation by the petitioner. The judgment followed the precedent set in The Commercial Tax Officer v. C. R. Varghese, highlighting the dealer's right to revise returns in specific circumstances. The writ petition was disposed of without any order on costs. en-us Thu, 05 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 29 Dec 2018 12:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365465 The court directed the 2nd respondent to permit the petitioner to revise the returns for December 2016 to include the diesel generator purchase, emphasizing completion of the process within three weeks of initiation by the petitioner. The judgment followed the precedent set in The Commercial Tax Officer v. C. R. Varghese, highlighting the dealer's right to revise returns in specific circumstances. The writ petition was disposed of without any order on costs. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 05 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365465