<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 909 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365437</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ appeal, affirming the legality of sealing the warehouse under Section 110 of the Customs Act, the extension of the period for issuing a show cause notice under Section 124, and the seizure of goods lacking proper documentation. The investigation was ordered to be promptly concluded, and the godown could not be unsealed until the completion of proceedings related to the seized goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2019 12:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530988" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 909 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365437</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ appeal, affirming the legality of sealing the warehouse under Section 110 of the Customs Act, the extension of the period for issuing a show cause notice under Section 124, and the seizure of goods lacking proper documentation. The investigation was ordered to be promptly concluded, and the godown could not be unsealed until the completion of proceedings related to the seized goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365437</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>