https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365425 The appeal was disposed of by the High Court, setting aside the service tax demand and penalty imposition. The court held that the extended period of limitation was not applicable based on legal precedents stating that renting of immovable property is not a taxable service. The appellant was directed to pay the service tax amount with interest within 30 days, with a warning of potential penalties for non-compliance under the Finance Act, 1994. en-us Fri, 13 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Aug 2018 09:23:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365425 The appeal was disposed of by the High Court, setting aside the service tax demand and penalty imposition. The court held that the extended period of limitation was not applicable based on legal precedents stating that renting of immovable property is not a taxable service. The appellant was directed to pay the service tax amount with interest within 30 days, with a warning of potential penalties for non-compliance under the Finance Act, 1994. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 13 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365425