https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365423 The High Court dismissed the Writ Petition challenging the Settlement Commission's decision, emphasizing the availability of an alternative remedy through appeal to the CESTAT. The Court upheld the Settlement Commission's procedural findings, highlighting the importance of full disclosure and good faith in settlement applications. The petitioner was directed to file an appeal within 30 days at CESTAT, bypassing the pending writ appeal. The Court affirmed the Single Judge's ruling and stressed the limited jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 in such matters. en-us Wed, 01 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Sep 2019 12:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365423 The High Court dismissed the Writ Petition challenging the Settlement Commission's decision, emphasizing the availability of an alternative remedy through appeal to the CESTAT. The Court upheld the Settlement Commission's procedural findings, highlighting the importance of full disclosure and good faith in settlement applications. The petitioner was directed to file an appeal within 30 days at CESTAT, bypassing the pending writ appeal. The Court affirmed the Single Judge's ruling and stressed the limited jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 in such matters. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 01 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365423