<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1715 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274473</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant as it was determined that the goods were correctly declared as scrap and old pipes, warranting no demand for differential duty. The impugned order imposing penalties and demanding differential duty was set aside as the goods were categorized as scrap and not subject to confiscation or penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2018 09:19:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530948" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1715 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274473</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant as it was determined that the goods were correctly declared as scrap and old pipes, warranting no demand for differential duty. The impugned order imposing penalties and demanding differential duty was set aside as the goods were categorized as scrap and not subject to confiscation or penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274473</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>