https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274463 The CESTAT dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution after noting that no one appeared for the appellant and no adjournment request was on record despite advance notice of hearing. The Tribunal recorded that the matter had been repeatedly listed and could not be kept pending indefinitely, and therefore declined to proceed further on the merits. en-us Thu, 18 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Aug 2018 09:19:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274463 The CESTAT dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution after noting that no one appeared for the appellant and no adjournment request was on record despite advance notice of hearing. The Tribunal recorded that the matter had been repeatedly listed and could not be kept pending indefinitely, and therefore declined to proceed further on the merits. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 18 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274463