https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14093 The court allowed the petition, directing the Tax Recovery Officer not to proceed with the auction of the houses until the objection filed by the petitioner is decided in accordance with rule 11 of the Second Schedule to the Income-tax Act. The court granted a four-month timeline for resolving the objections and ordered the refund of any security deposit made by the petitioner. The judgment emphasizes the importance of following due process, particularly rule 11, in tax recovery proceedings to protect the rights of claimants and ensure proper investigation before property auctions. en-us Tue, 06 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Sep 2011 18:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14093 The court allowed the petition, directing the Tax Recovery Officer not to proceed with the auction of the houses until the objection filed by the petitioner is decided in accordance with rule 11 of the Second Schedule to the Income-tax Act. The court granted a four-month timeline for resolving the objections and ordered the refund of any security deposit made by the petitioner. The judgment emphasizes the importance of following due process, particularly rule 11, in tax recovery proceedings to protect the rights of claimants and ensure proper investigation before property auctions. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 06 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14093