https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274453 Under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, individual notice to every director is not necessarily required once notice is issued to the company, and disputes over alleged evasion or constructive service of notice require evidence. A director's claim that he resigned before the complaint or was not in charge of the company's affairs involves disputed facts and is ordinarily for trial, not quashing. The provision also covers cheques issued to discharge a legally enforceable debt or liability, including liability said to belong to another company, subject to the statutory presumption under Section 139 and rebuttal at trial. en-us Fri, 13 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Jun 2019 10:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274453 Under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, individual notice to every director is not necessarily required once notice is issued to the company, and disputes over alleged evasion or constructive service of notice require evidence. A director's claim that he resigned before the complaint or was not in charge of the company's affairs involves disputed facts and is ordinarily for trial, not quashing. The provision also covers cheques issued to discharge a legally enforceable debt or liability, including liability said to belong to another company, subject to the statutory presumption under Section 139 and rebuttal at trial. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 13 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274453