<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 866 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365394</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the shares were allotted in settlement of a pre-existing liability and not as unexplained cash credit. The court emphasized the explainability of the transaction and established the legitimacy of the allotment, setting aside the additions made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2018 17:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530885" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 866 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365394</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the shares were allotted in settlement of a pre-existing liability and not as unexplained cash credit. The court emphasized the explainability of the transaction and established the legitimacy of the allotment, setting aside the additions made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365394</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>