<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 842 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365370</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, setting aside the penalty orders due to jurisdictional issues, defects in recording satisfaction, and inconsistencies between satisfaction and penalty imposition. The judgment emphasizes the importance of adhering to legal requirements and principles of natural justice in penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2018 07:50:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530854" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 842 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365370</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, setting aside the penalty orders due to jurisdictional issues, defects in recording satisfaction, and inconsistencies between satisfaction and penalty imposition. The judgment emphasizes the importance of adhering to legal requirements and principles of natural justice in penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365370</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>