<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (6) TMI 56 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14084</link>
    <description>The Tribunal&#039;s decision was upheld, ruling in favor of the assessee regarding the entitlement to claim a deduction under section 33A(7), proviso (ii), of the Income Tax Act as amended from 1st April 1982, at the rate of Rs.35,000 per hectare for the assessment year 1982-83. The Court emphasized the importance of applying the prevailing law at the time of assessment and rejected the Revenue&#039;s attempt to restrict the allowance based on past rates.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:01:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53084" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (6) TMI 56 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14084</link>
      <description>The Tribunal&#039;s decision was upheld, ruling in favor of the assessee regarding the entitlement to claim a deduction under section 33A(7), proviso (ii), of the Income Tax Act as amended from 1st April 1982, at the rate of Rs.35,000 per hectare for the assessment year 1982-83. The Court emphasized the importance of applying the prevailing law at the time of assessment and rejected the Revenue&#039;s attempt to restrict the allowance based on past rates.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14084</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>