<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 825 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365353</link>
    <description>The High Court found that the respondent&#039;s failure to pay service tax on the TDS amount constituted wilful suppression with intent to evade tax. The Court rejected the respondent&#039;s claim of a software error, reinstated the penalty under Section 78, and allowed a 25% reduction if paid within 30 days. The judgment emphasizes compliance with statutory requirements and the repercussions of manipulating accounts to avoid tax obligations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2018 15:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530834" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 825 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365353</link>
      <description>The High Court found that the respondent&#039;s failure to pay service tax on the TDS amount constituted wilful suppression with intent to evade tax. The Court rejected the respondent&#039;s claim of a software error, reinstated the penalty under Section 78, and allowed a 25% reduction if paid within 30 days. The judgment emphasizes compliance with statutory requirements and the repercussions of manipulating accounts to avoid tax obligations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365353</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>