<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 813 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365341</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal confirmed a service tax liability of approximately Rs. 1.63 crores against the appellant for the period April 2005 to March 2010, along with penalties under Sections 78 and 77 of the Finance Act, 1994. The demand was primarily for services falling under &quot;site formation&quot; and &quot;supply of tangible goods.&quot; The matter was remanded for re-examination regarding exempted road or bridge construction services and verification of whether principal contractors had discharged the service tax liability for the full contract amount. The Tribunal allowed the appeal for further examination by the Original Adjudicating Authority without expressing any opinion on the merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2018 07:20:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530819" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 813 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365341</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal confirmed a service tax liability of approximately Rs. 1.63 crores against the appellant for the period April 2005 to March 2010, along with penalties under Sections 78 and 77 of the Finance Act, 1994. The demand was primarily for services falling under &quot;site formation&quot; and &quot;supply of tangible goods.&quot; The matter was remanded for re-examination regarding exempted road or bridge construction services and verification of whether principal contractors had discharged the service tax liability for the full contract amount. The Tribunal allowed the appeal for further examination by the Original Adjudicating Authority without expressing any opinion on the merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365341</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>