<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 812 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365340</link>
    <description>Service tax demand based only on Form 26AS was treated as insufficient where the assessee claimed commission income was maintained on an accrual basis and may have been received in a later period. The discrepancy required verification against the assessee&#039;s books and records to determine whether the receipts related to earlier services and were correctly reflected in the relevant return period. The impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded to the Original Adjudicating Authority for fresh decision after examining the record.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2018 07:20:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530818" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 812 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365340</link>
      <description>Service tax demand based only on Form 26AS was treated as insufficient where the assessee claimed commission income was maintained on an accrual basis and may have been received in a later period. The discrepancy required verification against the assessee&#039;s books and records to determine whether the receipts related to earlier services and were correctly reflected in the relevant return period. The impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded to the Original Adjudicating Authority for fresh decision after examining the record.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365340</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>