https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365330 The Tribunal upheld the confirmation of a service tax demand of Rs. 2,41,790 against the assessee, along with a penalty, due to the appellant's failure to contest the demand earlier. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the penalties, citing the appellant's suppression of facts and failure to deposit tax amounts received. Despite the appellant's attempt to challenge part of the demand before the Tribunal, it was rejected based on the lack of contestation earlier, the amount involved, and the significant time lapse. The appeal was denied, affirming the decision on the service tax demand and penalties. en-us Tue, 03 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Aug 2018 07:13:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365330 The Tribunal upheld the confirmation of a service tax demand of Rs. 2,41,790 against the assessee, along with a penalty, due to the appellant's failure to contest the demand earlier. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the penalties, citing the appellant's suppression of facts and failure to deposit tax amounts received. Despite the appellant's attempt to challenge part of the demand before the Tribunal, it was rejected based on the lack of contestation earlier, the amount involved, and the significant time lapse. The appeal was denied, affirming the decision on the service tax demand and penalties. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 03 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365330