<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 788 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365316</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the demands, penalties, and confiscations imposed by the Revenue due to insufficient evidence and lack of corroborative proof in the case of alleged clandestine removal and seized goods. The judgment emphasized the necessity of tangible evidence and rejected demands based on assumptions or retracted statements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2018 07:05:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530790" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 788 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365316</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the demands, penalties, and confiscations imposed by the Revenue due to insufficient evidence and lack of corroborative proof in the case of alleged clandestine removal and seized goods. The judgment emphasized the necessity of tangible evidence and rejected demands based on assumptions or retracted statements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365316</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>