<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 786 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365314</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and ruling in favor of the appellant. It clarified that there is no restriction on availing Cenvat credit for service tax paid through supplementary invoices issued before 01.04.2011, as Rule 9(1)(bb) of the Cenvat Credit Rules does not have retrospective effect. The decision was based on legal principles and precedents, providing the appellant with the desired relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2018 07:05:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530788" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 786 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365314</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and ruling in favor of the appellant. It clarified that there is no restriction on availing Cenvat credit for service tax paid through supplementary invoices issued before 01.04.2011, as Rule 9(1)(bb) of the Cenvat Credit Rules does not have retrospective effect. The decision was based on legal principles and precedents, providing the appellant with the desired relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365314</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>