<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 783 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365311</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal by remand, emphasizing the importance of considering the protest letter for exemption from limitations under Section 11B. The case highlights the significance of due consideration of protest filings in refund claims under the Central Excise Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2018 07:04:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530785" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 783 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365311</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal by remand, emphasizing the importance of considering the protest letter for exemption from limitations under Section 11B. The case highlights the significance of due consideration of protest filings in refund claims under the Central Excise Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365311</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>