<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 782 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365310</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand for payment of duty on bagasse under Rule 6(3) of Cenvat Credit Rules. The decision was based on precedents from the Hon&#039;ble Allahabad High Court and the Hon&#039;ble Supreme Court, which clarified that bagasse is not excisable and does not incur duty liability. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2018 07:04:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530784" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 782 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365310</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand for payment of duty on bagasse under Rule 6(3) of Cenvat Credit Rules. The decision was based on precedents from the Hon&#039;ble Allahabad High Court and the Hon&#039;ble Supreme Court, which clarified that bagasse is not excisable and does not incur duty liability. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365310</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>