https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365307 Penalty under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 was challenged because the same adjudication had already been set aside in connected appeals against the main noticee and other persons. Since the impugned order no longer survived for those co-noticees, the penalty on the appellant, which arose from the same order, could not be sustained. The Tribunal accordingly set aside the penalty and allowed the appeal. en-us Tue, 03 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Aug 2018 07:03:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365307 Penalty under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 was challenged because the same adjudication had already been set aside in connected appeals against the main noticee and other persons. Since the impugned order no longer survived for those co-noticees, the penalty on the appellant, which arose from the same order, could not be sustained. The Tribunal accordingly set aside the penalty and allowed the appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 03 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365307