<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 777 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365305</link>
    <description>Chewing tobacco pouches were held not assessable under Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 where the Tribunal had already decided the same valuation issue in the assessee&#039;s own case. Following its earlier final orders, the Tribunal found that the contrary demand could not be sustained and set aside the impugned orders. The settled position in the same matter was treated as binding for the present appeals, with consequential relief granted to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2018 07:03:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530779" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 777 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365305</link>
      <description>Chewing tobacco pouches were held not assessable under Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 where the Tribunal had already decided the same valuation issue in the assessee&#039;s own case. Following its earlier final orders, the Tribunal found that the contrary demand could not be sustained and set aside the impugned orders. The settled position in the same matter was treated as binding for the present appeals, with consequential relief granted to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365305</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>