https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365303 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's claim for abatement of duty due to the continuous sealing of a machine for more than 14 days. Despite the machine being sealed at two different locations, the Tribunal found that it was continuously sealed for over 15 days under Revenue's supervision. The Revenue's objection was deemed hyper-technical, and the Tribunal held in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order and granting consequential relief. en-us Wed, 27 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Aug 2018 07:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365303 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's claim for abatement of duty due to the continuous sealing of a machine for more than 14 days. Despite the machine being sealed at two different locations, the Tribunal found that it was continuously sealed for over 15 days under Revenue's supervision. The Revenue's objection was deemed hyper-technical, and the Tribunal held in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order and granting consequential relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 27 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365303