<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 1324 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274445</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, finding that errors in excess depreciation claims and section 80HHC deduction were not concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The Tribunal also ruled in favor of the assessee on various issues including excess depreciation claims, section 80HHC deduction, loss disallowance on mutual fund investments, disallowance on directors&#039; remuneration, and other tax-related matters. The Tribunal directed the assessing authority to re-examine certain quantum issues and made decisions based on legal precedents and factual assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2018 16:25:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530768" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 1324 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274445</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, finding that errors in excess depreciation claims and section 80HHC deduction were not concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The Tribunal also ruled in favor of the assessee on various issues including excess depreciation claims, section 80HHC deduction, loss disallowance on mutual fund investments, disallowance on directors&#039; remuneration, and other tax-related matters. The Tribunal directed the assessing authority to re-examine certain quantum issues and made decisions based on legal precedents and factual assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274445</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>