<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (5) TMI 42 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14076</link>
    <description>The Court held in favor of the petitioner, finding that the delay in filing revision applications was justified due to bona fide proceedings with the appeal. The petitioner was entitled to deduction of excise duty for the assessment years 1971-72 to 1975-76, following the mercantile system of accounting. The Court emphasized the importance of following binding precedent and judicial discipline, setting aside the CIT&#039;s order and granting the petitioner the deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:40:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53076" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (5) TMI 42 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14076</link>
      <description>The Court held in favor of the petitioner, finding that the delay in filing revision applications was justified due to bona fide proceedings with the appeal. The petitioner was entitled to deduction of excise duty for the assessment years 1971-72 to 1975-76, following the mercantile system of accounting. The Court emphasized the importance of following binding precedent and judicial discipline, setting aside the CIT&#039;s order and granting the petitioner the deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14076</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>