https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365297 Section 482 inherent power is not barred by Section 397(3), but it cannot be used as a substitute for a second revision and must be invoked sparingly to prevent abuse of process, miscarriage of justice, or clear legal error. Where the complaint disclosed material already within the complainant's reach, the Magistrate declined police investigation under Section 156(3) and proceeded under Section 200, and the revisional court affirmed that course, no special ground existed for extraordinary interference. The High Court therefore declined to interfere and treated the petition as untenable on the facts. en-us Tue, 03 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Aug 2018 20:40:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365297 Section 482 inherent power is not barred by Section 397(3), but it cannot be used as a substitute for a second revision and must be invoked sparingly to prevent abuse of process, miscarriage of justice, or clear legal error. Where the complaint disclosed material already within the complainant's reach, the Magistrate declined police investigation under Section 156(3) and proceeded under Section 200, and the revisional court affirmed that course, no special ground existed for extraordinary interference. The High Court therefore declined to interfere and treated the petition as untenable on the facts. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 03 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365297