https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274438 The Supreme Court upheld the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, except for specific provisions. The definition of 'family' under Section 2(f) and the maximum amount payable under Section 11(6) were upheld. However, subsections (1), (2), and (3) of Section 23, the opening words of Section 23(4), and Section 27(1) were struck down as unconstitutional. The Act was found to align with the Directive Principles of State Policy, except for the invalidated sections. en-us Mon, 01 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Aug 2018 17:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274438 The Supreme Court upheld the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, except for specific provisions. The definition of 'family' under Section 2(f) and the maximum amount payable under Section 11(6) were upheld. However, subsections (1), (2), and (3) of Section 23, the opening words of Section 23(4), and Section 27(1) were struck down as unconstitutional. The Act was found to align with the Directive Principles of State Policy, except for the invalidated sections. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 01 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274438