https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274438 The Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 was treated as a social-welfare measure implementing Articles 39(b) and 39(c), and was held substantially protected by Articles 31B and 31C despite challenges under Articles 14, 19 and 31. The majority upheld the definition of "family," the ceiling scheme, and the maximum amount provision in section 11(6), and substantially sustained section 23 as directed to the common good. Section 27(1), however, was held invalid to the extent it barred transfer of built-up urban property within the ceiling limit, and was severed from the rest of the Act. en-us Mon, 01 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Aug 2018 17:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274438 The Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 was treated as a social-welfare measure implementing Articles 39(b) and 39(c), and was held substantially protected by Articles 31B and 31C despite challenges under Articles 14, 19 and 31. The majority upheld the definition of "family," the ceiling scheme, and the maximum amount provision in section 11(6), and substantially sustained section 23 as directed to the common good. Section 27(1), however, was held invalid to the extent it barred transfer of built-up urban property within the ceiling limit, and was severed from the rest of the Act. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 01 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274438