https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274437 A petition under Section 482 CrPC read with Article 227 is not ordinarily maintainable after an earlier revision before the Sessions Court because Section 397(3) bars a second revision, and inherent or supervisory jurisdiction is reserved for exceptional cases of abuse of process, grave injustice, or patent illegality. In prosecutions for criminal breach of trust under Sections 405 and 406 IPC, limitation is assessed with reference to the complaint date where later cognizance is delayed by court process. At the charge stage, the court only examines whether a prima facie case of entrustment and refusal to return is shown, not the defence in detail. en-us Mon, 30 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 24 Feb 2024 10:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274437 A petition under Section 482 CrPC read with Article 227 is not ordinarily maintainable after an earlier revision before the Sessions Court because Section 397(3) bars a second revision, and inherent or supervisory jurisdiction is reserved for exceptional cases of abuse of process, grave injustice, or patent illegality. In prosecutions for criminal breach of trust under Sections 405 and 406 IPC, limitation is assessed with reference to the complaint date where later cognizance is delayed by court process. At the charge stage, the court only examines whether a prima facie case of entrustment and refusal to return is shown, not the defence in detail. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 30 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274437