<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (12) TMI 40 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14072</link>
    <description>The court held that customs duty and sales tax collected in earlier years should be treated as income, dismissing the argument against taxing them. However, the court allowed the claim for entertainment expenditure. The Explanation to section 37(2B) was found to apply prospectively, not retrospectively, supporting the assessee&#039;s position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:28:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53072" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (12) TMI 40 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14072</link>
      <description>The court held that customs duty and sales tax collected in earlier years should be treated as income, dismissing the argument against taxing them. However, the court allowed the claim for entertainment expenditure. The Explanation to section 37(2B) was found to apply prospectively, not retrospectively, supporting the assessee&#039;s position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14072</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>