<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 796 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274433</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court affirmed the High Court&#039;s judgment in a case involving the interpretation of a Government Order regarding waiver of interest on defaulted revenue. The Court upheld the adjustment of the amount collected by the department towards the respondent&#039;s liability and emphasized substantial compliance with procedural provisions. The validity of a Revenue Recovery Notice was also upheld, directing the demand to be based on the adjusted amount. The Court found no jurisdictional error in the High Court&#039;s judgment and dismissed the appeal, instructing the appellants to adjust the collected amount and recalculate the liability, with costs quantified at Rs. 10,000/-.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2018 10:10:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530712" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 796 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274433</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court affirmed the High Court&#039;s judgment in a case involving the interpretation of a Government Order regarding waiver of interest on defaulted revenue. The Court upheld the adjustment of the amount collected by the department towards the respondent&#039;s liability and emphasized substantial compliance with procedural provisions. The validity of a Revenue Recovery Notice was also upheld, directing the demand to be based on the adjusted amount. The Court found no jurisdictional error in the High Court&#039;s judgment and dismissed the appeal, instructing the appellants to adjust the collected amount and recalculate the liability, with costs quantified at Rs. 10,000/-.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274433</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>