<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 764 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365292</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition because the issue raised was materially identical to, and covered by, its earlier decision in Commissioner of Income Tax Kolkata XII v. Calcutta Export Company. As the precedent governed the controversy, no independent adjudication was required, and the petition was disposed of on that basis. Any pending applications were also disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2018 07:44:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530694" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 764 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365292</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition because the issue raised was materially identical to, and covered by, its earlier decision in Commissioner of Income Tax Kolkata XII v. Calcutta Export Company. As the precedent governed the controversy, no independent adjudication was required, and the petition was disposed of on that basis. Any pending applications were also disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365292</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>