<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 107 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14069</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the Tribunal erred in law by recalling its original order, which was prejudicial to the Revenue. The Court found that the Tribunal effectively reviewed its own decision, a power not conferred by the Income-tax Act. The Court emphasized that such a review is impermissible unless explicitly provided by statute. Consequently, the Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, stating that the Tribunal&#039;s action in recalling its original order was not justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:20:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53069" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 107 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14069</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the Tribunal erred in law by recalling its original order, which was prejudicial to the Revenue. The Court found that the Tribunal effectively reviewed its own decision, a power not conferred by the Income-tax Act. The Court emphasized that such a review is impermissible unless explicitly provided by statute. Consequently, the Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, stating that the Tribunal&#039;s action in recalling its original order was not justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14069</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>