<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 750 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365278</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the reopening of the assessment under Section 147/148 as the Assessing Officer relied on borrowed satisfaction without independent application of mind. Consequently, the reassessment proceedings were invalidated, making the addition under Section 68 academic. The Cross Objection by the assessee was allowed, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2018 07:43:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530680" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 750 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365278</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the reopening of the assessment under Section 147/148 as the Assessing Officer relied on borrowed satisfaction without independent application of mind. Consequently, the reassessment proceedings were invalidated, making the addition under Section 68 academic. The Cross Objection by the assessee was allowed, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365278</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>