https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365276 The Tribunal remitted the case back to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication regarding the deletion of surplus due to rejection of exemption under Section 11. The Tribunal emphasized verifying if specified persons rendered actual services and had necessary qualifications. It was highlighted that only excessive payments should be disallowed under relevant sections. Other issues decided by the CIT(A) were not challenged and deemed final. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes. en-us Wed, 18 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Aug 2018 07:43:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365276 The Tribunal remitted the case back to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication regarding the deletion of surplus due to rejection of exemption under Section 11. The Tribunal emphasized verifying if specified persons rendered actual services and had necessary qualifications. It was highlighted that only excessive payments should be disallowed under relevant sections. Other issues decided by the CIT(A) were not challenged and deemed final. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 18 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365276