<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 738 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365266</link>
    <description>The court found that the plaintiff failed to prove the cash deposit of Rs. 30 lakhs with the defendant Bank, as the Bank demonstrated the consolidation of the initial two deposits. Consequently, the plaintiff&#039;s claims for recovery of the disputed amount and subsequent interest were dismissed. The judgment and decree of the lower court were overturned, and the suit was dismissed with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2018 07:43:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530668" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 738 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365266</link>
      <description>The court found that the plaintiff failed to prove the cash deposit of Rs. 30 lakhs with the defendant Bank, as the Bank demonstrated the consolidation of the initial two deposits. Consequently, the plaintiff&#039;s claims for recovery of the disputed amount and subsequent interest were dismissed. The judgment and decree of the lower court were overturned, and the suit was dismissed with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365266</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>