<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 735 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365263</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning the availability of abatement on Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services under Notification No.01/2006-ST. The dispute arose over the endorsement requirement on consignment notes for availing abatement. The Tribunal held that the endorsement procedure was not mandatory and could not be used to deny the abatement claim when the conditions of the notification were otherwise fulfilled. The Tribunal set aside the demand and penalty imposed by the Commissioner (Appeals), allowing the appeal with consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2018 07:42:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530665" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 735 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365263</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning the availability of abatement on Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services under Notification No.01/2006-ST. The dispute arose over the endorsement requirement on consignment notes for availing abatement. The Tribunal held that the endorsement procedure was not mandatory and could not be used to deny the abatement claim when the conditions of the notification were otherwise fulfilled. The Tribunal set aside the demand and penalty imposed by the Commissioner (Appeals), allowing the appeal with consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365263</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>