<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 1247 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274426</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed both appeals by the Revenue, upholding the benefit of exemption under Sections 11 and 12 of the IT Act, 1961. It found the salary payments to be justified and comparable to previous years, with no evidence of excessiveness presented. The AO&#039;s failure to substantiate the claim of excessive salary led to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeals on both grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2018 20:06:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530658" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 1247 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274426</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed both appeals by the Revenue, upholding the benefit of exemption under Sections 11 and 12 of the IT Act, 1961. It found the salary payments to be justified and comparable to previous years, with no evidence of excessiveness presented. The AO&#039;s failure to substantiate the claim of excessive salary led to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeals on both grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274426</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>