<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1355 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274427</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part. It directed the AO to restrict the addition to the combined peak credit balance of undisclosed bank accounts and upheld the addition due to the difference in purchases. Other grounds raised by the assessee were dismissed as not pressed. The order was pronounced on 13th October 2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2018 20:06:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530657" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1355 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274427</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part. It directed the AO to restrict the addition to the combined peak credit balance of undisclosed bank accounts and upheld the addition due to the difference in purchases. Other grounds raised by the assessee were dismissed as not pressed. The order was pronounced on 13th October 2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274427</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>