<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1574 - ITAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274431</link>
    <description>The case involved transfer pricing adjustments in the IT and ITES segments, inclusion/exclusion of comparables, allocation of director&#039;s remuneration between STP and Non-STP units, and penalty initiation and interest issues. The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to make additions towards transfer pricing adjustments and wrong allocation of director&#039;s salary. The Tribunal also provided guidance on the selection of comparables, directing the AO to include specific companies if they pass relevant filters. The issue of director&#039;s remuneration allocation was sent back for fresh examination, and the penalty initiation was deemed premature, with interest being consequential.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2018 20:06:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530653" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1574 - ITAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274431</link>
      <description>The case involved transfer pricing adjustments in the IT and ITES segments, inclusion/exclusion of comparables, allocation of director&#039;s remuneration between STP and Non-STP units, and penalty initiation and interest issues. The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to make additions towards transfer pricing adjustments and wrong allocation of director&#039;s salary. The Tribunal also provided guidance on the selection of comparables, directing the AO to include specific companies if they pass relevant filters. The issue of director&#039;s remuneration allocation was sent back for fresh examination, and the penalty initiation was deemed premature, with interest being consequential.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274431</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>