<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 731 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365259</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed in part for statistical purposes. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to tax only the combined peak credit balance of undisclosed bank accounts, set aside the addition of gifts received from parents due to lack of evidence, and sent back the issue of unsecured loans for proper consideration. The decision highlighted the importance of thorough verification and consideration of evidence in tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2018 20:05:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530652" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 731 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365259</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed in part for statistical purposes. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to tax only the combined peak credit balance of undisclosed bank accounts, set aside the addition of gifts received from parents due to lack of evidence, and sent back the issue of unsecured loans for proper consideration. The decision highlighted the importance of thorough verification and consideration of evidence in tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365259</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>