https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274423 The Supreme Court dismissed the suit for specific performance as the plaintiff failed to prove readiness and willingness to perform the contract, leading to the forfeiture of earnest money. The court found the evidence provided by the attorney holder and property dealer insufficient, resulting in the denial of specific performance relief. The lower court's judgment was set aside, and the plaintiff was not granted any relief. en-us Tue, 05 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Aug 2023 18:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274423 The Supreme Court dismissed the suit for specific performance as the plaintiff failed to prove readiness and willingness to perform the contract, leading to the forfeiture of earnest money. The court found the evidence provided by the attorney holder and property dealer insufficient, resulting in the denial of specific performance relief. The lower court's judgment was set aside, and the plaintiff was not granted any relief. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 05 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274423