https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274419 The court dismissed both writ petitions, confirming the detention orders. It held that the retraction of a co-accused's statement did not significantly impact the decision. Legibility concerns with documents were deemed invalid as material portions were conveyed adequately. The absence of customs endorsements on certain bills did not invalidate the detention. The court found the discrepancy between grounds and affidavit insignificant. The delay in executing the order was justified, and the grounds remained valid. Ultimately, the court found no merit in the petitioners' contentions. en-us Mon, 20 Apr 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Aug 2018 16:17:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274419 The court dismissed both writ petitions, confirming the detention orders. It held that the retraction of a co-accused's statement did not significantly impact the decision. Legibility concerns with documents were deemed invalid as material portions were conveyed adequately. The absence of customs endorsements on certain bills did not invalidate the detention. The court found the discrepancy between grounds and affidavit insignificant. The delay in executing the order was justified, and the grounds remained valid. Ultimately, the court found no merit in the petitioners' contentions. Case-Laws FEMA Mon, 20 Apr 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274419