<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 736 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274415</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court set aside the Orissa High Court&#039;s judgment, remitting the matter for fresh consideration. The High Court&#039;s decision to quash proceedings based on unauthorized investigation was deemed erroneous due to reliance on an overruled Patna High Court decision. The Supreme Court emphasized the duty of counsel to assist the Court and uphold professional standards, directing a reevaluation of the petitions considering all relevant aspects and Court decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2018 14:43:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530635" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 736 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274415</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court set aside the Orissa High Court&#039;s judgment, remitting the matter for fresh consideration. The High Court&#039;s decision to quash proceedings based on unauthorized investigation was deemed erroneous due to reliance on an overruled Patna High Court decision. The Supreme Court emphasized the duty of counsel to assist the Court and uphold professional standards, directing a reevaluation of the petitions considering all relevant aspects and Court decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274415</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>