<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 710 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365238</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the Pr.CIT&#039;s order under section 263, restoring the AO&#039;s assessment order for the assessees for the assessment years 2010-11 and 2011-12. The tribunal concluded that the Pr.CIT&#039;s concerns were speculative or based on differences of opinion, while the AO had adequately examined the relevant issues during the assessment, leading to the admission of the appeals despite the delay in filing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2018 14:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530595" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 710 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365238</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the Pr.CIT&#039;s order under section 263, restoring the AO&#039;s assessment order for the assessees for the assessment years 2010-11 and 2011-12. The tribunal concluded that the Pr.CIT&#039;s concerns were speculative or based on differences of opinion, while the AO had adequately examined the relevant issues during the assessment, leading to the admission of the appeals despite the delay in filing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365238</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>