https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365236 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai allowed the appeals by M/s Giriraj Steel, setting aside the lower authorities' rejection of the refund claim for special additional duty on imported goods. The Tribunal found that the appellant had adequately demonstrated that the duty incidence was not passed on to customers, as required by the Customs Act, 1962. The judgment in favor of M/s Giriraj Steel was pronounced on 30/07/2018. en-us Mon, 30 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Aug 2018 06:11:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365236 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai allowed the appeals by M/s Giriraj Steel, setting aside the lower authorities' rejection of the refund claim for special additional duty on imported goods. The Tribunal found that the appellant had adequately demonstrated that the duty incidence was not passed on to customers, as required by the Customs Act, 1962. The judgment in favor of M/s Giriraj Steel was pronounced on 30/07/2018. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 30 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365236