<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 707 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365235</link>
    <description>The appellate court overturned the trial court&#039;s acquittal of the respondent in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found that the appellant had sufficiently proven the case, ordering the respondent to pay double the cheque amount as compensation or face six months of imprisonment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2018 06:11:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530590" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 707 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365235</link>
      <description>The appellate court overturned the trial court&#039;s acquittal of the respondent in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found that the appellant had sufficiently proven the case, ordering the respondent to pay double the cheque amount as compensation or face six months of imprisonment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365235</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>