<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 700 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365228</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Revision, favoring the appellant&#039;s argument that an Order-in-Appeal had already been issued. Regarding the classification of services, the Tribunal noted ambiguity in show cause notices and inconsistent classifications by the Department, leading to confusion. The Department&#039;s lack of clarity and varied classifications supported the assessee&#039;s position that the services did not fall under Business Auxiliary Services. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals and granted relief to the assessee, emphasizing the Department&#039;s inconsistencies in classifications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2019 12:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530578" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 700 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365228</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Revision, favoring the appellant&#039;s argument that an Order-in-Appeal had already been issued. Regarding the classification of services, the Tribunal noted ambiguity in show cause notices and inconsistent classifications by the Department, leading to confusion. The Department&#039;s lack of clarity and varied classifications supported the assessee&#039;s position that the services did not fall under Business Auxiliary Services. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals and granted relief to the assessee, emphasizing the Department&#039;s inconsistencies in classifications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365228</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>